Welcome to InspirePilots.com

Join the leading DJI Inspire community for free!

FAA tests British Anti-UAV Defence System (AUDS)

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Scotflieger, Jun 2, 2016.

Tags:
  1. Scotflieger

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2015
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    571
    Location:
    Buckie, Scotland, UK
    slim.slamma likes this.
  2. spero

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2016
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    19
    I hope it does more than jam the radio signal... Most drones can fly a set path. Jamming a signal wont stop a drone flying on a set route pre-programmed in. A couple of Florida rednecks with lawn chairs and a bottle of Wild Turkey 101 would do a better job than a jamming device.
     
    damoncooper likes this.
  3. The Editor

    The Editor Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    3,861
    A 'set path' is no good when the UAV has neither control signal or GPS.
    The UAV can do nothing more than land (or hover until the battery depletes)
     
    Scotflieger likes this.
  4. Rush

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2016
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    1
    So this works until the first drone is manufactured that failsafe's to accelerometer control in absence of gps and signal control. Not necessarily a wise manufacturing move though, unless the gyro's and accelerometer are of such quality that they can accurately track current location, and their growing volume of uncertainty as time passes.
     
  5. RaptorMan

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    213
    If it not only jams the RC<->Drone comm but also the GPS signal it may well freeze the drone in place, but the battery will eventually die and the drone is going to come down. I'm guessing that if the FAA approves this method they may push the drone makers to have the firmware react to loss of both RC<->Drone comm and GPS by slowly descending until its landed. I'm not actually sure what my i1 would do now if it lost all RF.


    Brian
     
  6. lake_flyer

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2014
    Messages:
    1,104
    Likes Received:
    341
    If it jams the GPS the craft would go into Atti mode. While hovering, the wind could send it many miles away (maybe even OVER the area they would like to protect) until the batteries die. I wonder if they thought of that. Unless they could take over the control signal completely they wouldn't be able to have the craft hover and stay on the same spot.
    I guess........

    They say the ray is making the drone unresponsive. I fear a unresponsive drone could actually be more dangerous than a controlled drone, maybe they can shoot it down once it's over a safe area.
     
    #6 lake_flyer, Jun 4, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2016
    damoncooper likes this.
  7. The Editor

    The Editor Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    3,861
    A little off topic but.......has anyone considered that the latest firmware (which changed the 2.4ghz encryption) may have actually been implemented to comply and pander to the FAA so that taking control of the FHSS data stream is made easier for authorities?
    Hmmmmm???????
     
    damoncooper likes this.
  8. InspiredOne

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    657
    Location:
    South Florida, USA
    IGNORANT ALERT!

    So will the (U.S.) AUDS signal abruptly end at five miles out from its point of origin around airports? Have we learned how to send out light rays (visible and/or radio) that end at a predetermined distance?
     
  9. damoncooper

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2014
    Messages:
    3,451
    Likes Received:
    1,620
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    I believe that's the change yes
     
  10. RaptorMan

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    213

    Yeah, our governments love the back doors now don't they -- with or without KY...


    Brian
     
  11. RaptorMan

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    213

    I don't think the idea is to permanently broadcast the jamming signal, in fact the FCC has rules against that. What this system is intended to do as I understand it is to provide point defense for high value locations such as the White House or the Supper Bowl.


    Brian
     
  12. The Editor

    The Editor Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    3,861
    Is that why da Vinci painted The Last Supper? :p (couldn't resist sorry.......)
     
  13. InspiredOne

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    657
    Location:
    South Florida, USA
    That makes sense. Thanks!